Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
|
iothings:proiecte:2017:microsal [2021/12/06 18:28] dan.tudose [Waveform] |
iothings:proiecte:2017:microsal [2021/12/06 18:30] (current) dan.tudose [Requirements] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| The high level design is described in the design figures | The high level design is described in the design figures | ||
| - | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:big.jpg?direct&100|}} | + | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:big.jpg?direct&500|}} |
| - | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:small.png?direct&100|}} | + | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:small.png?direct&500|}} |
| Relative size of the embedded device | Relative size of the embedded device | ||
| - | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:toothdesign.png?direct&100|}} | + | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:toothdesign.png?direct&500|}} |
| - | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:high-level.png?direct&100|}} | + | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:high-level.png?direct&500|}} |
| - | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:protdes.png?direct&100|}} | + | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:protdes.png?direct&500|}} |
| high level designs of the hardware | high level designs of the hardware | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| The first generation is represented by a single project: a clunky system with a tongue suppressor probe. Although large, expensive, and somewhat not portable (While the device could run on batteries, it’s size and the size of the probe made multi-tasking hard), the device proved the effectiveness of the neuro-elecro-stimulation procedure in alleviating symptoms. As the device gave promising results in proof-of principle clinical studies and did cause any local or systemic adverse effects, it was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1988 (PMA No. P860067) | The first generation is represented by a single project: a clunky system with a tongue suppressor probe. Although large, expensive, and somewhat not portable (While the device could run on batteries, it’s size and the size of the probe made multi-tasking hard), the device proved the effectiveness of the neuro-elecro-stimulation procedure in alleviating symptoms. As the device gave promising results in proof-of principle clinical studies and did cause any local or systemic adverse effects, it was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1988 (PMA No. P860067) | ||
| - | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:1st.png?direct&300|}} | + | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:1st.png?direct&400|}} |
| First-generation neuroelectrostimulation device consisted of a hand-held probe, tipped with stainless steel electrodes, and a console that housed a battery and the electronic signal-generating power source, the size and shape of which were similar to a video or CD player | First-generation neuroelectrostimulation device consisted of a hand-held probe, tipped with stainless steel electrodes, and a console that housed a battery and the electronic signal-generating power source, the size and shape of which were similar to a video or CD player | ||
| Line 62: | Line 63: | ||
| Second-generation removable device consists of 3 components: a miniaturized electronic stimulator that has a signal generator, power source, and conducting circuitry; an intra-oral removable appliance; an infrared remote control. | Second-generation removable device consists of 3 components: a miniaturized electronic stimulator that has a signal generator, power source, and conducting circuitry; an intra-oral removable appliance; an infrared remote control. | ||
| The second most important aspect that the second generation improved upon is that now, the device can be worn non-invasively and controlled remotely through the day. | The second most important aspect that the second generation improved upon is that now, the device can be worn non-invasively and controlled remotely through the day. | ||
| - | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:2nd.png?direct&300|}} | + | |
| + | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:2nd.png?direct&400|}} | ||
| The miniaturized electronic stimulator is mounted in a removable intraoral appliance (A), which is under remote control that activates the stimulator (B). This device is applied into the mouth in a noninvasive manner (C) | The miniaturized electronic stimulator is mounted in a removable intraoral appliance (A), which is under remote control that activates the stimulator (B). This device is applied into the mouth in a noninvasive manner (C) | ||
| \subsection{3rd generation} | \subsection{3rd generation} | ||
| The third generation takes the process of reducing size to an extreme, creating a device that is small enough to completely fit inside a tooth. This allows for for an implant-supported neuro-electrostimulating device that can be permanently applied into the oral cavity, screwed onto an osteo-integrated dental implant inserted in the third molar area. | The third generation takes the process of reducing size to an extreme, creating a device that is small enough to completely fit inside a tooth. This allows for for an implant-supported neuro-electrostimulating device that can be permanently applied into the oral cavity, screwed onto an osteo-integrated dental implant inserted in the third molar area. | ||
| - | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:3rd.png?direct&300|}} | + | |
| + | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:3rd.png?direct&400|}} | ||
| Figure shows the implantation procedure and application of the device. Transmucosal exposure of mandibular bone (A) is followed by preparation of the implant bed in mandibular bone (B) and insertion of the dental root implant (C). The neuro-electrostimulating device is shown in its applicator (D) and mounted onto the root implant (E). A radiograph of the implant-supported device is shown (F). | Figure shows the implantation procedure and application of the device. Transmucosal exposure of mandibular bone (A) is followed by preparation of the implant bed in mandibular bone (B) and insertion of the dental root implant (C). The neuro-electrostimulating device is shown in its applicator (D) and mounted onto the root implant (E). A radiograph of the implant-supported device is shown (F). | ||
| </hidden> | </hidden> | ||
| Line 110: | Line 115: | ||
| The device, once soldered will be stored in a bio-compatible metal cylinder casing, designed to provide protection and support. The casing will be attached similarly of a dental implant, inside the bone of the patient (3rd generation neuroelectrostimulation device). The casing is designed to provide the support and function of a real tooth, while not obstructing wireless communication. | The device, once soldered will be stored in a bio-compatible metal cylinder casing, designed to provide protection and support. The casing will be attached similarly of a dental implant, inside the bone of the patient (3rd generation neuroelectrostimulation device). The casing is designed to provide the support and function of a real tooth, while not obstructing wireless communication. | ||
| - | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:screw.png?direct&100|}} | + | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:screw.png?direct&500|}} |
| + | |||
| + | Design of the casing that will hold the device. Notice the fillet that allows for the upper part removal and the hole inside the upper cap that allows for wireless signal communication. | ||
| - | Design of the casing that will hold the device. Notice the fillet that allows for the upper part removal and the hole inside the upper cap that allows for wireless signal comunication | + | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:board.png?direct&500|}} |
| - | {{:iothings:proiecte:microsal:board.png?direct&100|}} | + | |
| PCB design of the Microsal Embedded Device. Multiple pads are present in order to have add-on connection to the sensors, after the electrical components are soldered on | PCB design of the Microsal Embedded Device. Multiple pads are present in order to have add-on connection to the sensors, after the electrical components are soldered on | ||
