This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
|
ep:labs:08:contents:tasks:ex5 [2022/09/23 14:21] cezar.craciunoiu [05. [40p] Windows API] |
ep:labs:08:contents:tasks:ex5 [2023/10/21 12:48] (current) cezar.craciunoiu [05. [20p] Windows API] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ==== 05. [40p] Windows API ==== | + | ==== 05. [20p] Windows API ==== |
| <note warning> | <note warning> | ||
| For this task we will use the project skeleton inside the //**Task-05**// folder. | For this task we will use the project skeleton inside the //**Task-05**// folder. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| Here is a solution using the skeleton: {{ep:laboratoare:lab08-task05-sol.zip}} | Here is a solution using the skeleton: {{ep:laboratoare:lab08-task05-sol.zip}} | ||
| - | For grading this task I would go with (you can use any other grading method as long as it's fair): | + | In this updated version, only the calls need to be done, as the exercise was made more simple. |
| - | * 5p respecting the CSV format (basically if the tables actually look like tables); this applies to people which will not use the skeleton | + | |
| - | * 15p the first table | + | |
| - | * 10p half of the second table (doesn't need to be a consecutive half) | + | |
| - | * 10p the other half of the second table | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The first table is easier (and values more points) such that students get reaccustomed to WinAPI and the skeleton. | + | |
| </solution> | </solution> | ||
| | | ||
| Line 23: | Line 17: | ||
| The first will contain system information provided by PSAPI. | The first will contain system information provided by PSAPI. | ||
| The second will print memory information for any accessible process and their name. | The second will print memory information for any accessible process and their name. | ||
| - | |||
| - | **We want to print information in kB instead of bytes for processes**. | ||
| <note tip> | <note tip> | ||