Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
|
ep:labs:04:contents:tasks:ex1 [2023/10/29 20:48] radu.mantu |
ep:labs:04:contents:tasks:ex1 [2023/10/29 21:08] (current) radu.mantu |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
| The system as a whole provides many functionalities that are grouped by **tables**: //filter, nat, mangle, raw, security//. If you want to alter a packet header, you place a rule in the //mangle// table. If you want to mask the private IP address of an internal host with the external IP address of the default gateway, you place a rule in the //nat// table. Depending on the table you choose, you will gain or lose access to some chains. If not specified, the default is the //filter// table. | The system as a whole provides many functionalities that are grouped by **tables**: //filter, nat, mangle, raw, security//. If you want to alter a packet header, you place a rule in the //mangle// table. If you want to mask the private IP address of an internal host with the external IP address of the default gateway, you place a rule in the //nat// table. Depending on the table you choose, you will gain or lose access to some chains. If not specified, the default is the //filter// table. | ||
| - | **Chains** are basically lists of rules. The five built-in chains are //PREROUTING, FORWARD, POSTROUTING, INPUT, OUTPUT//. Each of these corresponds to certain locations in the network stack where packets trigger **Netfilter hooks** ([[https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/net/ipv4/ip_input.c#L540|here]] is the //PREROUTING// kernel hook as an example -- not that hard to add one, right?) For a selected chain, the order in which the rules are evaluated is determined primarily by the priority of their tables and secondarily by the user's discretionary arrangement (i.e.: order in which rules are inserted). | + | **Chains** are basically lists of rules. The five built-in chains are //PREROUTING, FORWARD, POSTROUTING, INPUT, OUTPUT//. Each of these corresponds to certain locations in the network stack where packets trigger **Netfilter hooks** ([[https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5.9/source/net/ipv4/ip_input.c#L569|here]] is the //PREROUTING// kernel hook as an example -- not that hard to add one, right?) For a selected chain, the order in which the rules are evaluated is determined primarily by the priority of their tables and secondarily by the user's discretionary arrangement (i.e.: order in which rules are inserted). |
| {{ :ep:labs:04:contents:tasks:iptables_path.png?800 |}} | {{ :ep:labs:04:contents:tasks:iptables_path.png?800 |}} | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
| The **jump target** represents an action to be taken. You are most likely familiar with the built-in actions such as //ACCEPT// or //DROP//. These actions decide the ultimate fate of the packet and are final (i.e.: rule iteration stops when these are invoked). However, there are also extended actions (see ''man iptables-extensions(8)'') that are not terminal verdicts and can be used for various tasks such as auditing, forced checksum recalculation or removal of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) bits. | The **jump target** represents an action to be taken. You are most likely familiar with the built-in actions such as //ACCEPT// or //DROP//. These actions decide the ultimate fate of the packet and are final (i.e.: rule iteration stops when these are invoked). However, there are also extended actions (see ''man iptables-extensions(8)'') that are not terminal verdicts and can be used for various tasks such as auditing, forced checksum recalculation or removal of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) bits. | ||
| - | The **match criteria** of every rule are checked to determine if the jump target is applied. The way this is designed is very elegant: every type of feature (e.g.: l3 IP address vs l4 port) that you can check has a match callback function defined in the kernel. If you want, you can write your own such function in a Linux Kernel Module (LKM) and thus extend the functionality of **iptables** ([[https://inai.de/documents/Netfilter_Modules.pdf|Writing Netfilter Modules]] with code example). However, you will need to implement a userspace shared library counterpart. When you start an **iptables** process, it searches in ///usr/lib/xtables/ // and automatically loads certain shared libraries (note: this path can be overwritten or extended using the //XTABLES_LIBDIR// environment variable). Each library there must do three things: | + | The **match criteria** of every rule are checked to determine if the jump target is applied. The way this is designed is very elegant: every type of feature (e.g.: Layer 3 IP address vs Layer 4 port) that you can check has a match callback function defined in the kernel. If you want, you can write your own such function in a Linux Kernel Module (LKM) and thus extend the functionality of **iptables** ([[https://inai.de/documents/Netfilter_Modules.pdf|Writing Netfilter Modules]] with code example). However, you will need to implement a userspace shared library counterpart. When you start an **iptables** process, it searches in ///usr/lib/xtables/ // and automatically loads certain shared libraries (note: this path can be overwritten or extended using the //XTABLES_LIBDIR// environment variable). Each library there must do three things: |
| * define **iptables** flags for the new criteria that you want to include. | * define **iptables** flags for the new criteria that you want to include. | ||
| * define help messages for when ''**iptables** %%--%%help'' is called (its help message is an amalgamation of each library's help snippet). | * define help messages for when ''**iptables** %%--%%help'' is called (its help message is an amalgamation of each library's help snippet). | ||
