Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

dsm:assignments:01 [2025/10/05 19:32]
emilian.radoi
dsm:assignments:01 [2026/10/04 16:41] (current)
emilian.radoi
Line 1: Line 1:
 ===== Project ===== ===== Project =====
 +
   * **Team**: 2 members.   * **Team**: 2 members.
   * **Project Selection**:​   * **Project Selection**:​
Line 17: Line 18:
 === Milestones and Deliverables === === Milestones and Deliverables ===
  
-== 1. M1 (04.11.24) - Related Work / State-of-the-Art Review + Presentation (1p) ==+== 1. M1 (02.11.25) - Related Work / State-of-the-Art Review + Presentation (1.5p) ==
   * **Objective**:​ Establish the research context by reviewing and summarising related work (existing studies and relevant literature related to your topic).   * **Objective**:​ Establish the research context by reviewing and summarising related work (existing studies and relevant literature related to your topic).
     * **Action Items**:     * **Action Items**:
Line 24: Line 25:
       * Identify gaps in the research or areas for potential improvement.       * Identify gaps in the research or areas for potential improvement.
     * **Documentation (English, IEEE format)**: Create a report section (2 pages excluding references) detailing your findings, including citations of key papers and a discussion of how your project will build upon or differ from existing work.     * **Documentation (English, IEEE format)**: Create a report section (2 pages excluding references) detailing your findings, including citations of key papers and a discussion of how your project will build upon or differ from existing work.
-    * **Upload Documentation**:​ [[https://​curs.upb.ro/​2024/​mod/​assign/​view.php?​id=49434|Upload]] must contain title and authors. 
     * **Grading**     * **Grading**
-      * **(0.3p) ​References**:​ Include a minimum of 10 academic papers in your review. +      * **References**:​ Include a minimum of 10 academic papers in your review. 
-      * **(0.2p) ​Research Questions**:​ Provide at least 2 meaningful research questions that will answer, or that should be addressed in future work. Helpful guide [[https://​atlasti.com/​guides/​qualitative-research-guide-part-1/​research-question | here]]. +      * **Research Questions**:​ Provide at least 2 meaningful research questions that you will answer, or that should be addressed in future work. Helpful guide [[https://​atlasti.com/​guides/​qualitative-research-guide-part-1/​research-question | here]]. 
-      * **(0.5p) ​Content**: Capture the current landscape of the topic. You may use qualitative surveys for inspiration. Also **check the tips below**). In your review explicitly answer these sub-questions,​ each worth 0.1p: +      * **Content**:​ Capture the current landscape of the topic. You may use qualitative surveys for inspiration. Also **check the tips below**). In your review explicitly answer these sub-questions,​ each worth 0.1p: 
-          * What datasets are used and why? (0.1p) +          * What datasets are used and why? 
-          * What benchmarks or evaluation methods are used? Are there any limitations? ​(0.1p) +          * What benchmarks or evaluation methods are used? Are there any limitations?​ 
-          * What are the current shortcomings in the field? ​(0.1p) +          * What are the current shortcomings in the field? 
-          * How do the works relate to each other? (e.g: one paper addresses another'​s limitations,​ several share the same assumptions or techniques)? ​(0.1p) +          * How do the works relate to each other? (e.g: one paper addresses another'​s limitations,​ several share the same assumptions or techniques)?​ 
-          * What architectures and training techniques are used? Any noteworthy or novel approaches? ​(0.1p)+          * What architectures and training techniques are used? Any noteworthy or novel approaches?
     * **Presentation**:​     * **Presentation**:​
       * Prepare a 5 minute presentation (with slides) that summarises your review.       * Prepare a 5 minute presentation (with slides) that summarises your review.
       * State the topic / problem, the context, and the direction you intend to pursue (your research questions).       * State the topic / problem, the context, and the direction you intend to pursue (your research questions).
-      * The presentation is graded on a 0 to 1 scale and will be used to scale the M1 score.+      * Your M1 score will be determined based on the presentation. Both team members must contribute ​to the presentation.
   * **Tips**:   * **Tips**:
     * How to read research papers efficiently - [[https://​dslsrv1.rnet.missouri.edu/​resources/​HowToReadAPaper.pdf | the 3-pass method]].     * How to read research papers efficiently - [[https://​dslsrv1.rnet.missouri.edu/​resources/​HowToReadAPaper.pdf | the 3-pass method]].
Line 48: Line 48:
       * Evaluate papers based on the **number of citations** (though newer papers may have fewer), year of publication and author credibility.       * Evaluate papers based on the **number of citations** (though newer papers may have fewer), year of publication and author credibility.
     * Choose a topic that truly interests you. It will make the research process more engaging and enjoyable.     * Choose a topic that truly interests you. It will make the research process more engaging and enjoyable.
 +    * **Upload M1 (Documentation)**:​ [[https://​curs.upb.ro/​2025/​mod/​assign/​view.php?​id=24449|Upload]] must contain title and authors.
  
   ​   ​
-== 2. M2 (18.11.24) - Dataset Collection and Baseline Results (1p) ==+== 2. M2 (27.11.25) - Dataset Collection and Baseline Results (0.5p) ==
   * **Objective**:​ Obtain the datasets required for your project and implement a baseline model for comparison.   * **Objective**:​ Obtain the datasets required for your project and implement a baseline model for comparison.
     * **Action Items**:     * **Action Items**:
Line 61: Line 62:
       * **Evaluation Metrics**: Choose appropriate metrics (e.g., accuracy, F1-score, ROC-AUC) and document initial performance.       * **Evaluation Metrics**: Choose appropriate metrics (e.g., accuracy, F1-score, ROC-AUC) and document initial performance.
     * **Documentation (English, IEEE format)**: Submit a report section (2 pages excluding references) describing the dataset, preprocessing steps, baseline model, and results.     * **Documentation (English, IEEE format)**: Submit a report section (2 pages excluding references) describing the dataset, preprocessing steps, baseline model, and results.
-    * **Upload Documentation**:​ [[https://​curs.upb.ro/​2024/​mod/​assign/​view.php?​id=49438|Upload]] must contain title and authors. 
     * **Grading**     * **Grading**
       * **(0.5p) Dataset description**:​ Description and rationale for the selected datasets, including dataset purpose, number of records, data quality, collection method, size, and feature description.       * **(0.5p) Dataset description**:​ Description and rationale for the selected datasets, including dataset purpose, number of records, data quality, collection method, size, and feature description.
Line 67: Line 67:
       * **(0.3p) Initial results**: Presentation of baseline performance results       * **(0.3p) Initial results**: Presentation of baseline performance results
       * **(0.1p) Result analysis**: Interpretation and insights from the obtained results.       * **(0.1p) Result analysis**: Interpretation and insights from the obtained results.
 +    * **Upload M2 (Documentation and Code)**: [[https://​curs.upb.ro/​2025/​mod/​assign/​view.php?​id=24452|Upload]] must contain title and authors.
  
-== 3. M3 (18.12.24) - Own Contribution (1p) ==+ 
 +== 3. M3 (18.12.25) - Own Contribution (0.5p) ==
   * **Objective**:​ Develop and implement your original contribution to the field, either by addressing a new research problem or improving an existing approach.   * **Objective**:​ Develop and implement your original contribution to the field, either by addressing a new research problem or improving an existing approach.
     * **Types of contributions**:​     * **Types of contributions**:​
Line 80: Line 82:
             * Propose a hybrid model that combines multiple approaches (e.g., combining CNNs with decision trees).             * Propose a hybrid model that combines multiple approaches (e.g., combining CNNs with decision trees).
     * **Documentation (English, IEEE format)**: Write a report section (2 pages excluding references) **justifying your chosen approach**, detailing your contribution,​ how it differs from existing work, and comparing your experimental results to the baseline and state-of-the-art.     * **Documentation (English, IEEE format)**: Write a report section (2 pages excluding references) **justifying your chosen approach**, detailing your contribution,​ how it differs from existing work, and comparing your experimental results to the baseline and state-of-the-art.
-    * **Upload Documentation and Code**: [[https://​curs.upb.ro/​2024/​mod/​assign/​view.php?​id=49446|Upload]] must contain title and authors. 
     * **Grading**:​     * **Grading**:​
       * (0.3p) Clear and well-justified explanation of your contribution/​s.       * (0.3p) Clear and well-justified explanation of your contribution/​s.
       * (0.5p) Implementation and results on selected dataset/s.       * (0.5p) Implementation and results on selected dataset/s.
       * (0.2p) Result analysis, and comparison with the baseline.       * (0.2p) Result analysis, and comparison with the baseline.
 +    * **Upload M3 (Documentation and Code)**: [[https://​curs.upb.ro/​2025/​mod/​assign/​view.php?​id=24454|Upload]] must contain title and authors.
  
-== 4. M4 (08.01.25) - Final paper + Presentation (1p) ==+ 
 +== 4. M4 (11.01.25) - Final paper + Presentation (1.5p) ==
   * **Objective**:​ Compile your project into a well-organised academic report.   * **Objective**:​ Compile your project into a well-organised academic report.
     * **Action Items**:     * **Action Items**:
Line 100: Line 103:
         * **Conclusion**:​ Summarise outcomes, limitations and suggest directions for future research.         * **Conclusion**:​ Summarise outcomes, limitations and suggest directions for future research.
     * **Documentation (English, IEEE format)**: Submit a polished, formal academic report in IEEE format (8 pages excluding references).     * **Documentation (English, IEEE format)**: Submit a polished, formal academic report in IEEE format (8 pages excluding references).
-    * **Upload Documentation**:​ [[https://​curs.upb.ro/​2024/​mod/​assign/​view.php?​id=49445|Upload]] must contain title and authors. 
     * **Presentation (6 minutes)** - prepare a concise, visually clear presentation covering:     * **Presentation (6 minutes)** - prepare a concise, visually clear presentation covering:
         * The problem addressed and its relevance.         * The problem addressed and its relevance.
Line 106: Line 108:
         * Experimental results and your main contributions.         * Experimental results and your main contributions.
         * Conclusions and potential areas for future research.         * Conclusions and potential areas for future research.
-      * Create ​well-polished slides with clear visuals, including figures, graphs and performance metrics. +      * **Presentations tips**: create ​well-polished slides with clear visuals, including figures, graphs and performance metrics. 
-    * **Evaluation**:​ The presentation will be graded based on clarity, depth of explanation,​ the quality of results and the Q&A section. The final project ​grade will be weighted ​based on the presentation quality. +    * **Evaluation**:​ The presentation will be graded based on clarity, depth of explanation,​ the quality of results and the Q&A section. The M4 grade is determined ​based on the presentation quality. Both team members must contribute to the presentation. 
-    * **Upload ​Presentation**: [[https://​curs.upb.ro/​2024/​mod/​assign/​view.php?​id=49444|Upload]]+    * **Upload ​M4 (Documentation and Slides)**: [[https://​curs.upb.ro/​2025/​mod/​assign/​view.php?​id=24456|Upload]] ​must contain title and authors.
  
  
Line 115: Line 117:
 ==== Grading System ==== ==== Grading System ====
   * **Total Points** = M1 + M2 + M3 + M4   * **Total Points** = M1 + M2 + M3 + M4
-    * M1 and M4 will have their grade (G) scaled by the score of the presentation (P): TOTAL = G * P  
  
-=== Examples of Project Ideas ===+---- 
 + 
 + 
 +==== Examples of Project Ideas ====
  
 === 1. Bad Posture Detection === === 1. Bad Posture Detection ===
dsm/assignments/01.1759681950.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/10/05 19:32 by emilian.radoi
CC Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
www.chimeric.de Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki do yourself a favour and use a real browser - get firefox!! Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0