Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
pp:l08 [2020/04/02 19:12] pdmatei |
pp:l08 [2020/04/12 22:34] (current) uvlad |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ======= Lab 8 - The Lambda Calculus ======= | + | ======= 8. The Lambda Calculus ======= |
1. Consider the following datatype which encodes λ-expressions: | 1. Consider the following datatype which encodes λ-expressions: | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
</code> | </code> | ||
- | 4. Write a function which takes a λ-expression of the form ''(λx.<body> <arg>)'' and **reduces it in a SINGLE step**. | + | 6. Write a function which takes a λ-expression of the form ''(λx.<body> <arg>)'' and **reduces it in a SINGLE step**. |
- What should ''(λx.(x x) y)'' produce? | - What should ''(λx.(x x) y)'' produce? | ||
- What should ''(λx.λx.(x x) y)'' produce? | - What should ''(λx.λx.(x x) y)'' produce? | ||
- | 5. Add two data constructors to the type ''LExpr'' so that we can also model functions and applications in uncurry form. | + | 7. Add two data constructors to the type ''LExpr'' so that we can also model functions and applications in uncurry form. |
Examples: ''(λx y z.<body>)'', ''(f x y z)''. | Examples: ''(λx y z.<body>)'', ''(f x y z)''. | ||
- | 6. Write a proper display function for these new constructors. | + | 8. Write a proper display function for these new constructors. |
- | 7. Write a function ''lcurry'' which takes a curried λ-expression and transforms it in uncurry form. | + | 9. Write a function ''luncurry'' which takes an uncurries λ-expression and transforms it in curry form. |
<code haskell> | <code haskell> | ||
lcurry :: LExpr -> LExpr | lcurry :: LExpr -> LExpr | ||
</code> | </code> | ||
- | 8. Write a function ''luncurry'' which takes an uncurries λ-expression and transforms it in curry form. | + | 10. Write a function ''lcurry'' which takes a curried λ-expression and transforms it in uncurry form. |
- | Examples: ''( ((f x) y) z)'' becomes ''(f x y z)''. | + | <code> |
+ | (((f x) y) z) becomes (f x y z) | ||
+ | (((f ((g a) b)) y) ((h u) v)) becomes (f (g a b) y (h u v)) | ||
+ | </code> | ||
+ | |||
+ | 11. Write the function ''fv'' which computes the list of all **free variables** of a λ-expression. | ||
+ | <code haskell> | ||
+ | fv :: LExpr -> [Char] | ||
+ | </code> | ||
+ | |||
+ | 12. Write a function ''bv'' which computes the list of all **bound variables** of a λ-expression. | ||
+ | <code haskell> | ||
+ | bv :: LExpr -> [Char] | ||
+ | </code> | ||
+ | |||
+ | 13. Write a function ''subst'' which computes the //textual substitution of all free occurrences of some variable x by e in e'//, according to the lecture definition: | ||
+ | <code haskell> | ||
+ | subst :: Char -> LExpr -> LExpr -> LExpr | ||
+ | </code> | ||
+ | |||
+ | 14. Implement a function which reduces a **reducible** λ-expression to an irreducible one. (According to the lecture definition, what happens with λx.(λx.x x) ? | ||
+ | <code haskell> | ||
+ | reduce :: LExpr -> LExpr | ||
+ | </code> | ||
+ | |||
+ | 15. Implement **normal-order** evaluation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 16. Implement **applicative** (strict) evaluation. | ||
- | Also, ''( ((f ((g a) b)) y) ((h u) v))'' becomes ''(f (g a b) y (h u v))'' | ||