Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
lfa:2022:lab05-mindfa [2022/11/07 01:36]
mihai.calitescu duplicate states
lfa:2022:lab05-mindfa [2022/11/12 20:49] (current)
alexandra.udrescu01
Line 3: Line 3:
 Consider the following DFAs:  Consider the following DFAs: 
  
-**DFA 1**{{ :​lfa:​2022:​lfa2022_lab5_ex2_4_cerinta.png?​350 |}} +**DFA 1** ^ **DFA 2** ^ 
- +|{{ :​lfa:​2022:​lfa2022_lab5_ex2_4_cerinta.png?​350 |}} {{ :​lfa:​screenshot_2021-11-03_at_11.25.00.png?​400 |}} |
-**DFA 2**: {{ :​lfa:​screenshot_2021-11-03_at_11.25.00.png?​400 |}}+
  
 <note important>​The first DFA is the solution to exercise 4.3.4 from Lab4.</​note>​ <note important>​The first DFA is the solution to exercise 4.3.4 from Lab4.</​note>​
Line 13: Line 12:
 5.1.1. Identify a pair of states which are **indistinguishable**. (Solve the exercise for the 2 given DFAs.) 5.1.1. Identify a pair of states which are **indistinguishable**. (Solve the exercise for the 2 given DFAs.)
  
-/* 
  
 <hidden DFA 1> <hidden DFA 1>
Line 35: Line 33:
 </​hidden>​ </​hidden>​
  
-*/ 
  
 5.1.2. Identify a pair of final or non-final states which are **distinguishable**. The pair must be distinguished by a word different from the empty word. (Solve the exercise for the 2 given DFAs.) 5.1.2. Identify a pair of final or non-final states which are **distinguishable**. The pair must be distinguished by a word different from the empty word. (Solve the exercise for the 2 given DFAs.)
  
-/* 
  
 <hidden DFA 1> <hidden DFA 1>
Line 53: Line 49:
 </​hidden>​ </​hidden>​
  
-*/ 
  
 5.1.3. Compute the table of indistinguishable states for the DFA. (Solve the exercise for the 2 given DFAs.) 5.1.3. Compute the table of indistinguishable states for the DFA. (Solve the exercise for the 2 given DFAs.)
  
-/* 
  
 <hidden DFA 1><​note tip> <hidden DFA 1><​note tip>
Line 206: Line 200:
 </​hidden>​ </​hidden>​
  
-*/ 
  
 ===== 5.2. Minimisation ====== ===== 5.2. Minimisation ======
Line 212: Line 205:
 5.2.1. Minimise the DFA. (Solve the exercise for the 2 given DFAs.) 5.2.1. Minimise the DFA. (Solve the exercise for the 2 given DFAs.)
  
-/* 
  
 <hidden DFA 1> <hidden DFA 1>
Line 226: Line 218:
 </​hidden>​ </​hidden>​
  
-*/ 
  
 5.2.2. How can we algorithmically determine if two minimal DFAs accept the same language? 5.2.2. How can we algorithmically determine if two minimal DFAs accept the same language?
  
-/* 
  
 <​hidden><​note tip> <​hidden><​note tip>
Line 243: Line 233:
 </​note></​hidden>​ </​note></​hidden>​
  
-*/ 
  
 5.2.3. Determine if the following regexes are **equivalent**:​ $math[(1\cup\epsilon)(00^*1)^*0^*] and $math[(10\cup 0)^*(01 \cup 1)^*(0 \cup \epsilon)] 5.2.3. Determine if the following regexes are **equivalent**:​ $math[(1\cup\epsilon)(00^*1)^*0^*] and $math[(10\cup 0)^*(01 \cup 1)^*(0 \cup \epsilon)]
  
-/* 
  
 <​hidden>​ <​hidden>​
Line 253: Line 241:
 </​hidden>​ </​hidden>​
  
-*/ 
  
 5.2.4. Remember exercise 3.3.4 from Lab3. Show that the two regexes are equivalent: $ E1 = ((ab^*a)^+b)^* $ and $ E2 = (a(b\mid aa)^*ab)^* $ 5.2.4. Remember exercise 3.3.4 from Lab3. Show that the two regexes are equivalent: $ E1 = ((ab^*a)^+b)^* $ and $ E2 = (a(b\mid aa)^*ab)^* $
  
-/* 
  
 <​hidden>​ <​hidden>​
Line 348: Line 334:
  
 </​note></​hidden>​ </​note></​hidden>​
- 
  
  
Line 357: Line 342:
 <note important>​Brzozowski minimisation:​ **minDfa(A) = toDfa(reverse(toDfa(reverse(A))))**</​note>​ <note important>​Brzozowski minimisation:​ **minDfa(A) = toDfa(reverse(toDfa(reverse(A))))**</​note>​
  
-/* 
  
 <​hidden>​ <​hidden>​
Line 398: Line 382:
 </​hidden>​ </​hidden>​
  
-*/ 
  
 ===== Conclusion ===== ===== Conclusion =====
Line 409: Line 392:
   * DFA -> minDfa   * DFA -> minDfa
  
-**We advise you to include minDfa conversion in your project.**+**To get a better performance, ​include minDfa conversion in your project.**
 </​note>​ </​note>​